Manager Buzz

July 25th, 2010

Here’s Some Advice for You in Regards to Conversational Hypnosis Igor Ledochowski

Posted in Psychologists Den, Self Improvement

It’s the cause of controversy but, you need to understand, there’s no shortage of experts active today who happily use black ops hypnosis. Employed to help treat physical, mental, and emotional troubles in addition to a potent mode of communication, this style of mind control works within the subject’s subconscious to generate the outcome you’re aiming for. In this way its uses range between the hilarious stunts you’ve seen on television or at student festivals and potent support for addiction to smoking. I can understand how this might appear slightly unnerving, but seasoned practitioners have it down to a science and create effectively no problems. conversational hypnosis like the form being taught in Underground Hypnosis boils down to inducing a trance state in someone. How deeply the subject falls into the trance state depends on elements such as their personality and emotional status. As you first induce trance, their smaller muscles start to unwind following an unconscious instruction. As their eyelids begin to droop, they’ll experience lethargy, wanting to sleep. As the hypnotist takes the subject deeper, this lack of tension begins spreading to the shoulders and hands. This typically takes virtually no time at all.

Picture being able to see and hear only one person. A seasoned hypnotist can take you to this state by taking you into a deep enough trance. As you reach this point, the power of suggestion comes in, establishing a pathway to the unconscious mind. The trance can intensify further to the point where the subject becomes able to forget specific recollections through suggestion.

You can bring your subject even further into a trance state, slowly introducing them to a hallucinatory level before an endpoint similar to that which is achieved when undergoing general anesthetic. Whenever anesthesia is believed unadvisable, hypnosis has occasionally been employed in its place.

You won’t find out how to achieve that level using Underground Hypnosis, but, naturally, you’d almost never require it. To all intents and purposes, the more easily reached strata are more than sufficient. We feel we should remind you that this power is offered to anyone who looks into Underground Hypnosis. All it takes is a day or so’s study and time to test your knowledge, and before you know it, you’ll be guiding people to follow your desires and developing your communication skills. It’s really as simple as that and not scary at all.

May 30th, 2010

Something You Have to Get a Hold on: Black Ops Hypnosis Techniques

Posted in Beyond Cats, Psychologists Den

Although the subject of much controversy, many practitioners welcome programs along the lines of Underground Hypnosis as strong techniques. It’s facile to describe hypnotic suggestion as “mind control” - because indeed the much repeated adage regarding “mind over matter” comes into play - you can communicate messages easily and alleviate, or even treat, emotional, physical and of course mental issues by use of the unconscious mind. So you can add work to vanquish depression or smoking addiction to any half remembered frat-party comedic hijinks. When employed by seasoned practitioners, there’s no real risk. So we turn to Underground Hypnosis, together with similar approaches to conversational hypnosis, and examine the basics; induction into a trance state. Depth of trance you can induce is affected by several elements, notably emotional status, hypnotist’s ability, and personality. The least deep trance level can be detected at the moment when the subject first starts to slacken certain smaller muscles. An urge to doze off arises at this point. You’ll watch shoulders slump as a deeper trance spreads throughout them with perceptible speed.

It’s possible to establish trance states sufficiently deep that the sound heard is exclusively that coming from whoever has hypnotized them. The fabled power of suggestion comes into play now, as the subconscious finds itself open to instruction. If you should you take your subject to a greater depth of trance, you’ll find a point where they can be helped to ignore pain, and block other sensations, even seal away memories. Past that you enter the realm of hallucination and similar altered perceptions; you can eventually reach a state like that experienced when undergoing general anesthetic. Where anesthesia seems unwise, hypnosis has occasionally been offered as an alternative. You won’t learn ways you can bring someone to that level through Underground Hypnosis, though, of course, you’d seldom require it. No, when aiming for the common goals of a hypnotist, you only need the more common strata of trance.

You know the best part? Everybody can learn these arts through the people behind Underground Hypnosis. Would this take long, you wonder? No time at all - a little reading, a day or two to try out the methods you’ve read about, and you’ll soon find you’ll have a real party piece. Why be worried? No reason to worry at all.

Click here and go to our marvelous page for black ops hypnosis instructions…

February 23rd, 2010

Conversational Hypnosis

Posted in Psychologists Den, Self Improvement

Underground Hypnosis carries a somewhat stormy rep, but as with comparable conversational hypnosis programs it can be a source of real help. It’s simplistic to mistake hypnosis for “mind control” - for the old adage concerning mind over matter remains absolutely pertinent; you can easily educate the subject and alleviate, maybe even treat, emotional, mental and even physical complaints by use of the unconscious mind. In this way you can use hypnosis for both the comedic tricks broadcast on TV shows or in student festivals and intensive assistance for mental disorder or addiction to tobacco. I do accept that this could disturb you, but seasoned practitioners know just what to do and create few if any issues.

Black ops hypnosis resembling the style passed on via the Underground Hypnosis system can be quickly stated as inducing trance in a subject. The depth to which the person falls into trance is determined by elements including their emotional status, hypnotist’s ability, and personality. Subconsciously, as you fall into a mild trance, you’ll unwind your minor muscles. The desire to fall asleep seems to come as a result of this. Gradually other muscles unwind too, chief among them the shoulders and hands - and typically, this is a speedy process.

A skilled practitioner can lead subjects down to trances sufficiently deep that the only sensory input received is that made by whoever has hypnotized them. Following this, the subject is sensitive to compulsion by hypnotic suggestion and influenced by their subconscious. When you lead your subject further into trance state, you’ll find a point where they will be able to disregard pain, and block other sensations, even shut away memories.

Beyond that lies hallucination and other altered perceptions; you can eventually establish a state reminiscent of that seen when undergoing general anesthetic. Subjects could go through certain medical procedures in this state without feeling pain.

You won’t learn ways you can induce that depth through underground hypnosis, but remember, naturally, it’s rarely called for. In order to convince the subject to do what you’re asking, all that’s needed is for them to achieve one of the earlier two degrees of a trance.

You know the best part? Everyone has the opportunity to study this skill via Underground Hypnosis. By devoting a little while to studying and a little more time fine-tuning your technique, you’ll quickly develop into quite a skilled hypnotist - with all that entails. Why be worried? Step up and learn.

April 24th, 2008

The NSTP ( Non-Spatial Thinking Process ) Theory

Posted in Psychologists Den

The term NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process) in the NSTP theory means thinking process existing in the form of non-spatial feelings. The theory is comprised of 7 theorems that are stated and demonstrated below.

Theorem 1:

Phenomenal mind (i.e. feelings or qualia) is non-spatial. In other words, no kind of feeling, e.g. feeling of bodily pain, can be represented by any spatial structure.

1. The feeling of bodily pain, for example, is conceptually distinct from its bodily counterpart (i.e. identification of some electrochemical signal in brain) for the following two reasons.

a. This conceptual distinction is obvious or self - evident or axiomatic to me. (It is important to note that I advocate ‘the principle of universal doubt’: anything may be possible, for that which is believed to be absolutely (or 100 %) certainly true at present could be false as the intellectual capacities of the believer may be limited. Thus all axioms are 99.99…% certain to me.)

b. The knowledge of the process of identification of electrochemical signal is not at all sufficient for the knowledge of the feeling of bodily pain, for example.

2. Theorem 1 is axiomatic to me. The abstract nature of a spatial structure and mechanism, involving transfer of information (in general, spatial actions), and the abstract nature of a feeling (which can only be experienced) are not equivalent.

Theorem 2:

All kinds of experiences, even abstract thoughts I know I am having, are ultimately feelings (or qualias).

1. When I know I am thinking, for example, this knowledge ultimately comes through some kind of feeling.

2. Theorem 2 is axiomatic to me.

Theorem 3:

I am a (temporal) stream of (non-spatial) mental events (i.e. feelings).
I am an NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process).

1. I am a group of feelings. I am not something other than feelings.

a. The feeling of pain, for example, is itself sufficient for its own existence. There is no need of some other substance (which is not a feeling itself) for the feeling of pain, for example, to exist.

b. When I know that I am feeling pain this knowledge itself, according to theorem 2, is ultimately represented as some feeling.

2. The feeling of bodily pain, for example, represents the idea, concept, or thought of the feeling of bodily pain (itself). Thus every feeling represents some thought. So I am an NSTP.

Theorem 4:

Feelings are most certainly real and thus physical or material.

1. The proposition ‘feelings are real’ is axiomatic to me.
I cannot deny I am feeling something at the moment. This feeling is the most real thing while the whole space, with all spatial entities including my body, could be a form of illusion. (I feel therefore I am.)

2. If something is real then it is physical or material. (The only exception to this rule is supposed to be the laws of logic which are meant to be eternal as they must exist forever. They cannot be changed and thus, despite being real, are not called physical or material.)

Theorem 5:

Space ( as a room or void out there: whether three or higher dimensional, bounded or unbounded ) is a mere form/kind of illusion. ( i.e., exclusively / only a virtual reality; a projection of non-spatial mind; a kind of feeling.)

1. The problem of spatial - non-spatial interaction and ontological [Ontology means theory of being. Here the term ontological is thus meant to be that which exists as real (esp. physical/material).] complexity-
If space and non-spatial mind are both realities (i.e. ontologically existent) then there are following two possibilities:

a. Spatial and non-spatial entities interact

b. Spatial and non-spatial entities do not interact but rather follow a parallelism

In the first case there is a problem ‘how spatial and non-spatial entities physically interact’ and in the both cases the model of the universe becomes unnecessarily (ontologically) complex as there are two real (ontologically existent) entities involved rather than just one.

2. The Zeno’s paradoxes -

a. The racecourse or dichotomy paradox:

‘There is no motion because that which is moved must arrive at the middle of its course before it arrives at the end. In order to traverse a line segment it’s necessary to reach the halfway point, but this requires first reaching the quarter-way point, which first requires reaching the eighth-way point, and so on without end. Hence motion can never begin.
This problem isn’t alleviated by the well-known infinite sum 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8… = 1 because Zeno is effectively insisting that the sum be tackled in the reverse direction. What is the first term in such a series ?’ (See David Darling: The universal book of mathematics, 2004.)

b. Achilles and the tortoise:

‘This is perhaps the most famous of the Zeno’s paradoxes.
The slower when running will never be overtaken by the quicker; for that which is persuing must first reach the point from which that which is fleeing started, so that the slower must necessarily always be some distance ahead. Thus, Achilles, however fast he runs, will never catch the plodding tortoise who started first. And yet, of course, in the real world, faster things do overtake slower ones.’ (See Simon Blackburn : Dictionary of philosophy, 1996.)

The Zeno’s paradoxes are out of the misbelief that space exists in the ontological sense, i.e. as a reality, out there. In fact, space is a virtual reality, a form/kind of illusion (existing in the form of non-spatial mind/s). Consequently (spatial) motion is also a form of illusion (to non-spatial observer/s). Thus reality (which is non-spatial) is not constrained by spatial infinities as whatever that is seen (i.e. experienced or felt) as happening in space is a mere illusion, with no resemblance to (non-spatial) reality. And illusion could be of any logically possible kind. In other words, that which creates (or is responsible for) the spatial illusion do not have to bother whether the mover has to first reach half of the distance and so on, or the faster has to first reach the point where the slower started or has infinitely many gaps to traverse, etc. The only thing is that it has to produce some dynamic spatial pattern (actually represented in the form of some non-spatial feelings or states of consciousness), as if a mover moving or the faster overtaking the slower. That’s it.

[ In analogy with (spatial) personal computers (PCs) a software programmer or graphic designer do not at all have to worry with Zeno’s arguments or paradoxes. All s/he has to do is to design and write a program in order to create an appropriate dynamic or changing pattern on the computer monitor screen. ]

[ The last two of the four Zeno’s paradoxes have different solutions which are stated in my article ‘The NSTP theoretical resolution of Zeno’s paradoxes’. (Published online. Please consult www.google.com) ]

3. The problem of quantum non-locality -

‘In 1997 experiments were conducted in which light particles (i.e. photons) originated under certain conditions and travelled in opposite directions to detectors located about seven miles apart. The amazing results indicated that the photons interacted or communicated with one another instantly or in no time.’ (See Robert Nadeau and Menas Kafatos, 1999. The non-local universe. 1st ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press.)

This problem is also out of the misbelief that space exists in the ontological sense, i.e. as a reality, out there. (Because if we believe that space does indeed exist in that sense then any spatial communication would need some appropriate spatial structure and time, whereas in the case of quantum non-locality the communication between photons is instantaneous and with apparently no spatial structure/mechanism in between.) However, space being a virtual reality (to non-spatial observer/s) the quantum non-locality is no longer mysterious or problematic as the photons and their behaviour is a mere form of illusion, a virtual reality.

[ Again in analogy with personal computers such a photonic behaviour on the computer monitor screen has no slightest mystery surrounding it, as it is just a dynamic or changing pattern of pixels modulated by some hidden software process/es. ] Zeno’s paradoxes (being logical) imply that space is logically necessarily a virtual reality. While quantum non-locality (being empirical) implies that space is not logically necessarily a virtual reality. That is, it may exist as a reality in some kind of world where quantum non-locality does not exist.

Theorem 6:

The spatial illusion (to individual non-spatial minds, such as humans, animals, etc.) is (orderly / thoughtfully) created or modulated by some superhuman non-spatial thinking process/es (NSTP/s). In other words, the individual (or peripheral) NSTP/s are created or modulated by some (central) superhuman NSTP/s (i.e. non-spatial feelings representing superhuman thoughts or ideas).

1. There should be some intelligence responsible for the immense order in the universe (e.g. gravitational phenomenon or quantum non-locality). I/we, the individual NSTP/s, are not responsible for the order (i.e. orderly spatial illusion). In general, in any machine where its peripherals are not intelligent enough to account for their own behaviour there has to be some central intelligent part in the machine to bring out the peripheral happenings or phenomena.

[ In analogy with personal computers the order in the dynamic pattern on the monitor screen is created by some central intelligent hardware representing some software. ]

2. As the spatial illusion (say, gravitational phenomenon or quantum non-locality) could be of any logically possible kind there has to be some way to change the ways individual NSTP/s are generated (or created or produced). And for that to be possible there has to be some central intelligence existing in the form of (non-spatial) feelings (It could be existing in some unknown non-spatial form instead, but it’s my conjecture that it exists in the form of (non-spatial) feelings.), which itself could be modulated to alter (or modulate) the modulation of individual NSTP/s.
[ In analogy with personal computers if the software instructions or parameters (ultimately some hardware pattern) are changed the dynamic pattern on monitor screen could be changed (or even destroyed). ]

3. The central NSTP/s represent superhuman thoughts or ideas (or, in general, mind) as they orderly create individual (non - superhuman) NSTP/s which is a super-task, distinctively beyond human capacities.

Theorem 7:

The central superhuman NSTP/s are processed instantaneously (i.e. in zero time).

This is because of no spatial limitations. (In space it takes time to transfer data from one spatial location to another.)

[ Although a conscious human being, for example, is nothing but an NSTP, it is, at least partially, conceptually (as in contrast with physically) bound to the spatial biochemical brain, and thus the central NSTP/s introduce time lag (i.e. temporal experience) in individual NSTP/s. ]

[ Thus, in computer terminology, in the NSTP model of reality the hardware of the universe is composed of non-spatial feelings, while its (central) software is made of superhuman thoughts, and the peripherals represent non-superhuman thoughts, concepts, or ideas. ]

How the non - spatial universal computer exactly works. -

Consider some experimental setup for detecting quantum non-locality. A conscious (human) being observing one of the photons (say A) is actually a peripheral NSTP. An event in this NSTP has some superhuman or meta representation in the central NSTP/s, which is caused and further processed by static (representing laws of physics : in computer terminology main instructions and parameters in the software) as well as dynamic (representing thoughts used merely for the purpose of processing : in computer terminology the run time data) NSTPs. According to theorem 7 this central processing takes no time, and thus within no time (i.e. instantaneously) creates appropriate illusion of the other photon (say B). Ultimately it appears that the two photons communicate with each other instantaneously or in zero time.

[ Theorems 1 to 4 are relatively axiomatic; theorems 5 to 7 are relatively hypothetical; while theorem 6 and thus theorem 7 are not necessary for the NSTP theory, at least for its nomenclature. ]

Conclusion

The 7 theorems of the NSTP theory

1. Feelings are non - spatial.

2. All experiences are feelings.

3. I, a conscious being, am an NSTP (Non-Spatial Thinking Process).

4. Feelings are physical or material.

5. Space is a virtual reality, that fact which the Zeno’s paradoxes necessarily imply (for if space is a reality, i.e. ontologically existent, then Zeno’s paradoxes would arise/be unsolved).

6. Individual or peripheral NSTP/s are orderly created by central superhuman NSTP/s.

7. The central superhuman NSTP/s take zero time for being processed.

The NSTP theory

1. Maintains both mentalism (or idealism: only mind is real), as only non-spatial mind is a reality, and materialism (or realism: only matter is real), as mind itself is matter.

2. Coincidently entails the ideas of philosophers, viz Descartes (mind as non-spatial), Kant (space as a projection of mind), Leibniz (material reality as fundamentally non-spatial : windowless monads in Leibniz’ monadism), and Sankara (world of appearance as Maya, i.e. illusion).

3. Strongly supports that idea of solipsism (I’m the only mind in the universe) as well as the idea that any apparently spatial entity could be conscious.

4. Falsifies general relativity, for example, on its physical or ontological side, while retaining its (so called) mathematical validity.

Problems with two other models of reality

1. Many - worlds:

a. Does not explain exactly how a single world splits into many (i.e. multiple) worlds and how multiple worlds unite into a single world.

b. Does not explain consciousness. (i.e. Does not provide appropriate physical basis for consciousness.)

2. String theories:

a. Do not explain consciousness.

b. Do not solve problems like quantum non-locality.

Kedar Joshi - EzineArticles Expert Author

I was born on 31 Dec 1979 to a Hindu (Brahmin) family, in Mumbai (Bombay), India, where I lived for the first 15 years of my life. Then I moved to Pune (Poona). In March 2004 I came to Cambridge, England where I currently live and work. I’m inclined to Christianity for its moral and social manifestation. I see most of the major world religions, including Hinduism and Christianity, to be parts of a bigger (Superultramodern) metaphysical picture.

Founder & President- Superultramodern Scientific Institution St John’s Innovation Centre
Cowley Road
Cambridge CB4 0WS
http://www.bssi.org.uk
email: kedarkj1@rediffmail.com

April 14th, 2008

Forensic Psychology

Posted in Psychologists Den

Not to be confused with the discipline of forensic science (the study of crime scenes, evidence, etc.) with which it does share a common platform, forensic psychology is one of the main bulwarks of criminal justice today. Basically, it finds application in the establishment of competency (selection of juries, witnesses, etc.) and the formulation of workable policies in justice administration.

Probably its most exciting and glamorous application is in the prediction of criminal patterns (for example, where will the serial killer strike next/who will his next victim be?). But forensic psychology is an integral weapon in other areas of justice, too. In the hearing of a criminal case, for instance, the effective cross-examination of a subpoenaed witness and the establishment of his/her credibility often calls for deep knowledge of forensic psychology.

The genesis of forensic psychology as a serious discipline probably dates back to the earliest part of the twentieth century, when the pioneering psychologist William Stern made concerted attempts to investigate individual personality in general and aberrations in particular. He did a lot of research on the human mind’s abilities of selective and compensative memory.

The results of his studies led to a deeper knowledge of why, for example, a certain collection of eyewitnesses to a crime will have vastly different recollections of the incident. After Stern, Hugo Munsterberg gave the science of forensic psychology definite shape and form in his book On the Witness Stand, which was first published in 1908.

Finally, forensic psychology is invaluable in maintaining justice in the criminal justice system by weeding out fraudulent informants and information, extracting factual information from inaccurately recollected testimonies, and establishing suitable aptitude and intelligence parameters among law enforcement personnel.

A forensic psychologist may also exercise his knowledge in formulating new policies for the rehabilitation of criminals.

Psychology provides detailed information on Psychology, Online Psychology Degrees, Forensic Psychology, Child Psychology and more. Psychology is affiliated with Mountain Retreats.